Files
Admin 5efd59826b
CI/CD / BackEnd (push) Successful in 1m27s
CI/CD / WebPlayer (push) Successful in 39s
CI/CD / Deploy (push) Skipped
CI/CD / BackEnd (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
CI/CD / WebPlayer (pull_request) Successful in 39s
CI/CD / Deploy (pull_request) Skipped
Use the shared edge nginx instead of Musify's own
Remove deploy/nginx and the nginx service from compose.prod.yml: the
shared edge in Infrastructure owns ports 80/443 and serves every
domain. Make the deploy job fail when zitadel-init or seaweedfs-init
fail, and document the runner and edge setup.
2026-09-23 16:56:27 +02:00

213 lines
9.9 KiB
Markdown

# Deploy
Everything needed to run Musify itself, in development and in production,
from the same set of compose files, no wrapper scripts, just `docker
compose`. Postgres, Zitadel, SeaweedFS, RabbitMQ and Jaeger are **not**
started here: they're shared infrastructure that lives in the separate
`Infrastructure` repository and has to already be running (see its own
README). `../../Infrastructure` below is just an example path, assuming
that repo happens to be checked out as a sibling of this one. Adjust it to
wherever you actually cloned it.
| File | Role |
|---|---|
| `compose.yml` | Musify's own services, including the one-shot bootstrap jobs. No published ports, no domains, no environment-specific values. |
| `compose.dev.yml` | Development overlay: publishes Musify's ports to the host. |
| `compose.prod.yml` | Production overlay: joins Infrastructure's `infra-net` network. |
| `.env` / `.env.prod` | The values compose interpolates. Not versioned; templates in `.env.example` / `.env.prod.example`. |
The four applications (`api`, `worker`, `gateway`, `web-player`) sit behind
the `apps` compose profile, so a plain `up` starts only the one-shot
bootstrap jobs, the usual development setup, with the apps running from the
IDE.
### The one-shot bootstrap jobs
Four services in `compose.yml` run once and exit, so a plain `docker compose
up -d` leaves the stack fully ready with no manual steps:
| Service | Does |
|---|---|
| `wait-for-postgres` | Waits for Infrastructure's Postgres to accept connections. Replaces an in-file health-check `depends_on`, which only works within the same compose file. |
| `keys-init` | Generates the RS256 stream-ticket key pair in `./keys`, if it is not there already. |
| `migrate` | Applies the EF Core migrations (built from `backend/Musify.Migrator.Dockerfile`). |
| `seaweedfs-init` | Creates Musify's own bucket on the shared SeaweedFS, if it doesn't exist yet. |
| `zitadel-init` | Creates the Musify project and its OIDC apps in the shared Zitadel (or reuses them), then writes `AUTH_CLIENT_ID` / `WEB_CLIENT_ID` / `WEB_CLIENT_SECRET` / `NATIVE_CLIENT_ID` into the env file. |
`api` and `worker` wait for `migrate`; `api` waits for `keys-init`
(`depends_on: condition: service_completed_successfully`). Nothing waits on
`zitadel-init`, `seaweedfs-init` or the shared infrastructure services
directly. Compose interpolates `${AUTH_CLIENT_ID}` once, when a command
starts, so a container that started in the *same* `up` as `zitadel-init`
would still get the empty value it had before provisioning ran. That's why
bringing up the apps is a second command: by the time you run it,
`zitadel-init` has already finished and the env file has real values.
---
## Development
Start the separate `Infrastructure` repository first, from wherever you
cloned it (see its own README for the exact command). Then, from this
repository's root:
```sh
docker compose -f deploy/compose.yml -f deploy/compose.dev.yml up -d
docker compose -f deploy/compose.yml -f deploy/compose.dev.yml --profile apps up -d --build
```
The first command starts Musify's own bootstrap jobs (Postgres wait, keys,
migrations, the bucket, the Zitadel project/apps). The second builds and runs
`api`, `worker`, `gateway` and `web-player` in Docker too. Skip it to run the
apps from the IDE instead (the usual dev loop):
```sh
dotnet run --project backend/Hosts/Musify.Api # :5111
dotnet run --project backend/Hosts/Musify.StreamingGateway # :8081
dotnet run --project backend/Hosts/Musify.Worker # background
npm --prefix web-player run dev # :5173
```
When running the apps from the IDE, `Musify.Api` reads `Authentication:*`
from user-secrets and `web-player` reads its own `web-player/.env`, neither
looks at `deploy/.env`. Copy the four values `zitadel-init` wrote
(`AUTH_CLIENT_ID`, `WEB_CLIENT_ID`, `WEB_CLIENT_SECRET`, `NATIVE_CLIENT_ID`)
into `dotnet user-secrets set Authentication:ClientId <value> --project
backend/Hosts/Musify.Api` and into `web-player/.env` once. They stay valid
until Infrastructure's Zitadel volume is wiped.
### Ports
| Service | Port | Used by |
|---|---|---|
| Musify.Api | `5111` | `/scalar/v1`, `/openapi/v1.json` |
| Musify.StreamingGateway | `8081` | `/health`, `/media/...` |
| web-player | `5173` (`npm run dev`) or `3000` (container) | |
Postgres, Zitadel, SeaweedFS, RabbitMQ and Jaeger ports come from
Infrastructure. See its own README for that table.
Host requirements: .NET 10 SDK, Node 22, Docker Desktop. ffmpeg is only
needed on the host if you run the Worker outside Docker; inside Docker its
image already has it.
### Why `host.docker.internal`
`PUBLIC_AUTH_URL` and `S3_PUBLIC_URL` point at `host.docker.internal`, which
resolves to the same address from the browser, from apps running on the host
and from inside the containers. That keeps the OIDC token issuer and the
presigned S3 URLs valid whichever way the apps are running, and is the same
address Infrastructure's own dev ports are published on.
### Resetting
```sh
docker compose -f deploy/compose.yml -f deploy/compose.dev.yml down # stop, keep data
docker compose -f deploy/compose.yml -f deploy/compose.dev.yml down -v # stop, wipe Musify's own volumes
```
This only touches Musify's own containers and volumes. Resetting Zitadel or
SeaweedFS is done from the `Infrastructure` repo instead.
---
## Production
Musify doesn't run its own nginx: the shared edge in Infrastructure
(`edge/`) owns host ports 80/443, terminates TLS for every project's domains
and proxies to Musify's containers over `infra-net`. On a server with
domains:
1. Bring up the `Infrastructure` repo first, with its own `.env.prod` filled
in. It creates the `infra-net` network this stack joins.
2. Bring up its `edge/` (see Infrastructure's README) and add Musify's
vhosts and certificate there (`edge/conf.d/musify.conf`). The five
public hostnames (web, api, stream, auth, s3) are independent: they
don't need to share a root domain.
3. From this repository's root:
```sh
cp deploy/.env.prod.example deploy/.env.prod
```
Replace every `*.example.com` with your domains (they must match the
edge's vhosts) and every `CHANGE_ME` with a random value
(`openssl rand -hex 24`). `chmod 600 deploy/.env.prod`.
Then:
```sh
docker compose --env-file deploy/.env.prod -f deploy/compose.yml -f deploy/compose.prod.yml up -d
docker compose --env-file deploy/.env.prod -f deploy/compose.yml -f deploy/compose.prod.yml --profile apps up -d --build
```
The first command starts Musify's bootstrap jobs (`zitadel-init` and
`seaweedfs-init` reach Zitadel/SeaweedFS through the public `auth.`/`s3.`
URLs, so the edge has to be serving them by then); the second builds and
starts the applications, already wired to the OIDC client ids the first one
produced. Both are idempotent, so running them again deploys a new version
(`... --profile apps up -d --build` alone is enough for an update once the
stack already exists).
Nothing in this stack publishes a port; everything is reachable only on the
internal `infra-net` network, through the edge.
### Continuous deployment
`.gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yml` runs the backend and web-player checks on every
push/PR, and on a successful push to `master` deploys automatically. The
deploy job runs on `gitea-runner`, the self-hosted Gitea Actions runner on
the production host (`~/gitea/docker-compose.yml`), configured by
`~/gitea/runner-data/config.yaml` (`CONFIG_FILE`): job containers are pinned
to the `gitea_gitea` network so `actions/checkout` can resolve `gitea`,
`ubuntu-latest` is `node:22` (JS actions need Node inside the job
container), and a `production:host` label runs steps natively.
Native mode means the label's steps execute inside the runner container
itself rather than a fresh one. That container has `/var/run/docker.sock`
mounted, so `docker`/`docker compose` there still control the host's real
Docker daemon (sibling containers, "Docker outside of Docker"). Its compose
service also bind-mounts `/home/ubuntu/deploys` into itself at the *same*
path, which matters because compose's own relative bind mounts (`./keys`)
are resolved by the host daemon against that literal path; mounting it
anywhere else would silently bind the wrong (empty) directory.
`DEPLOY_PATH` (hardcoded in the workflow as `/home/ubuntu/deploys/musify`)
is a persistent clone on that host, reused instead of a fresh checkout each
run since `deploy/.env.prod` is untracked and only lives there.
`/home/ubuntu/deploys/SharedServices` is the sibling clone of the
`Infrastructure` repo (shared services + `edge/`), already running; its
`.env.prod` shares the Postgres/RabbitMQ/S3 credentials with Musify's own
`deploy/.env.prod` by design (see that repo's README). The edge is deployed
from that repo, not from this pipeline.
---
## Layout
```
deploy/
├─ compose.yml # Musify's own services: wait-for-postgres, keys-init,
│ # migrate, seaweedfs-init, zitadel-init, api/worker/gateway/web-player
├─ compose.dev.yml # dev overlay: host ports
├─ compose.prod.yml # prod overlay: joins infra-net
├─ .env.example / .env.prod.example
└─ keys/ # RS256 stream-ticket key pair (generated)
```
The application images are built from `backend/Musify.*.Dockerfile` (build
context `backend/`, so restore can copy the central props and every csproj)
and `web-player/Dockerfile`.
## Notes
- **S3 credentials, the Postgres admin user, the RabbitMQ user and the
Zitadel masterkey** all live in Infrastructure's own `.env`/`.env.prod` now.
This project's env files only duplicate the values that have to match (see
the comments in `.env.example`).
- **Zitadel** runs `start-from-init`, which is idempotent: the same command
works on an empty volume and on an existing one.
- **Re-running `zitadel-init`, `seaweedfs-init` or `migrate`** is safe: they
reuse the existing project/apps/bucket by name, and `migrate` is a normal
`dotnet ef database update`, a no-op once the schema is current.